I work for a government organization in the U.S., and we have a team creating a web viewer for the 3D content our lab has been generating for the last several years. Our agency has high standards for data and metadata quality which I am required to meet in order to release the hundreds of models in our catalog. I've reviewed the help documentation and searched the forum and the internet at large and keep being told to just check the box to export metadata when exporting the textured mesh. That exports a metadata.xml file containing this:
<ModelMetadata version="1">
<SRS>LOCAL</SRS>
<SRSOrigin>0,0,0</SRSOrigin>
<SRSScale>1</SRSScale>
<SRSRotation>1,0,0,0</SRSRotation>
</ModelMetadata>
In order to publish our work, we need to meet the FGDC metadata standards for the collection/model. For any extra attributes specific to a particular type of data, we must either utilize an existing schema such as CSDGM and ISO 19115/2 or extend such a schema ourselves. At any rate, I am wondering if there is a way to get a more comprehensive metadata file with information about the inputs used, processes performed, filters run, settings selected, etc.
Thank you
<ModelMetadata version="1">
<SRS>LOCAL</SRS>
<SRSOrigin>0,0,0</SRSOrigin>
<SRSScale>1</SRSScale>
<SRSRotation>1,0,0,0</SRSRotation>
</ModelMetadata>
In order to publish our work, we need to meet the FGDC metadata standards for the collection/model. For any extra attributes specific to a particular type of data, we must either utilize an existing schema such as CSDGM and ISO 19115/2 or extend such a schema ourselves. At any rate, I am wondering if there is a way to get a more comprehensive metadata file with information about the inputs used, processes performed, filters run, settings selected, etc.
Thank you
Comment